·
Expected costs are
those that are covered by workers’ compensation insurance. Such expenses are
commonly referred to as direct costs.
·
Unexpected
costs
are those that workers’ compensation insurance does not cover. These expenses are
commonly referred to as indirect costs.
According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both direct and indirect costs can have
a substantial impact on employers and their bottom lines. As such, it’s
important for employers to understand the difference between direct and
indirect costs, how to reduce these costs and why it’s important to do so.
Direct vs. Indirect Costs
Direct
and indirect costs are determined by which expenses workers’ compensation
insurance will or will not cover. To reiterate, direct costs are those that are
covered by such insurance, which can include:
·
Employee
wage benefits—These benefits include temporary total, temporary partial,
permanent partial and permanent total disability. Employers have to pay these
benefits when an employee is unable to work or return to work in full capacity.
·
Medical
payments—These payments refer to any medical costs needed to treat an employee’s
injury.
·
Vocational
rehabilitation costs—These expenses are any costs associated with an employee’s
rehabilitation (e.g., training and career counseling).
·
Death/dependency
benefits—These benefits are for the spouse or dependents of an employee who was
killed by a work-related injury. Such benefits vary by state.
·
Legal fees—These
fees include those associated with a workers’ compensation claim, any civil
liability expenses and settlement costs.
Indirect
costs for a workers’ compensation claim are those not covered by such
insurance. These costs can vary depending on the extent of an employee’s
injury. Some indirect costs include:
·
Wage
and hour costs—These additional costs are incurred by employees who must work extra
hours to compensate for another employee’s time away from work. This includes
hiring temporary workers or having employees work overtime to fill in for the
missing worker.
·
HR
support expenses—This includes the increased work and time incurred by
individuals who handle workers’ compensation claims and related paperwork.
·
Claim
investigation costs—This includes costs associated with the investigation of a
workers’ compensation claim if there is a concern of fraud.
·
Hazard
mitigation costs—This includes costs associated with mitigating the hazard(s)
that caused an employee’s injury.
·
Production
deadline extensions—An injured employee’s absence can cause delays in
production, thus increasing production costs and negatively affecting business
contracts.
·
Training
expenses—This refers to the costs of training other employees to fill in for an
injured employee if they are unable to return to work in their original
capacity. This can be a temporary or permanent arrangement. If it’s permanent, the
company may have to cover the costs of hiring a new employee.
·
OSHA
fines—If an employee is injured or killed at work, an inspection will be
triggered and the employer may be subject to OSHA citations for any safety
issues found during the inspection. Also, the more employee injuries and
fatalities an employer experiences, the higher their business’s incident rate
will be—thus triggering more OSHA inspections.
·
Insurance
premium expenses—The more injury-related costs an employer experiences, the
higher their experience modification factor will be. As a result, their
business may be considered high risk and could receive increased premium rates.
·
Repair
costs—Repair expenses associated with property or equipment can also be considered
indirect costs, depending on whether or not the property or equipment was
involved in an injury-causing incident.
·
Workplace
culture concerns—A company with a high rate of injury may encounter poor
employee morale, particularly because employees may begin to think that their
employer does not care about their well-being. Typically, the lower morale is within
a company, the higher incident rates will be.
·
Reputational
struggles—A company with a high rate of workers’ compensation claims can garner
a bad reputation. With a poor reputation, business contracts and qualified
workers may be difficult to secure. A bad reputation can negatively impact an employer’s
bottom line and even lead to their business closing down altogether.
Controlling
these direct and indirect costs can be beneficial for employers. That’s why it’s
crucial to be proactive.
Reducing Direct and Indirect Costs
It’s
important for employers to understand that investing in their safety programs
can positively affect the outcome of direct and indirect costs. For instance,
managing safety programs at a business and having employees actively engage in
hazard identification can reduce the likelihood of injuries. By reducing
injuries, direct costs related to expenses such as wage benefits and medical
payments will also decrease. This will, in turn, lower indirect costs as well.
Having
a successful safety program is the foundation of reducing workers’ compensation
claims. If an employer cannot eliminate workers’ compensation claims, another
way to reduce direct and indirect claims is to proactively manage claims. This
can involve working with employees to get them back to work quicker after an
injury and following up with claims handlers. Furthermore, participating in the
claims process can improve communication between an employer and their employees,
as well as the employer and their insurance company.
Having an
effective return-to-work program can also help with reducing direct and
indirect costs. Having other work options for employees that fit within their
medical restrictions encourages employees to return to work quicker, thereby
reducing a significant amount of direct and indirect costs.
The Importance
of Reducing Direct and Indirect Costs
Minimizing
direct and indirect workers’ compensation costs is critical. By reducing
injuries, a company can continue to function normally, avoid interruptions and
prevent issues with production or business contracts.
According
to the National Safety Council (NSC), work-related injury costs for employers in
2019 totaled $171 billion. This total can be broken down as follows:
·
$52.9 billion
in wage and productivity losses
·
$35.5
billion in medical expenses
·
$59.7
billion in administrative expenses
Employers’
uninsured costs ($13.9 billion), property or equipment damage ($5 billion) and
fire-related losses ($3.7 billion) also contributed to this total.
In
breaking these costs down, the NSC found that such expenses came out to $1,100
per employee. Further, the average cost per fatality was $1.2 million, while
the average cost of an injured employee’s medical treatment was $42,000.
Overall,
by reducing employee injuries, employers can help create a positive work
culture and lower workers’ compensation expenses— thus minimizing both direct
and indirect costs.
Contact
Better Business Planning, Inc. to discuss your workers’ compensation needs.
No comments:
Post a Comment